- Pandora – Create and refine your own radio stations. Excellent for discovering new music.
- Midomi – Search by humming or singing into your microphone.
- Musicovery – Choose music based on time period, genre and mood.
- MuxTape – Create mp3 mixtapes.
- Project Playlist – Search for individual mp3s and create your own playlist.
- Mixwit – More mixtapes.
- MySong – Sing in a melody and get instant accompaniment.
Music worth trying, but NSFW:
Posted by Cliff on April 30th, 2008
Read More
Getting actual quantitative assessment of library instruction is something that most librarians hate to do–it often eats up our too-precious time with the students. And yet, I find myself dissatisfied with the “how’d I do?” opinion polls that we’ve used in the past.
So as part of our annual goals here at MPOW, we’ve created an online form for students to fill out as a pre- and post-test. The results write to a tab-delimited text file using ProcessForm 3.0.
By including a hidden date and timestamp, we’re able to separate classes as they are added to the text file, and then import them into a spreadsheet for analysis. Couple this with the students’ institutional ID number, and we can compare pre- and post-test scores while keeping the students’ anonymity intact.
With a little help (read: enforcement) from friendly professors, this test could be self-administered before and after the library instruction session to prevent eating into precious library instruction time. Additionally, the test could be performed pre- and post-library instruction, and then again at the end of the semester. Let’s see how much they really retain!
I welcome comments, criticism and suggestions! A big “thank you” to Andy and Sherrida for making this happen, and feel free to steal the code from the assessment form.
Posted by Cliff on April 23rd, 2008
Read More
This is from a Facebook App called Puzzlebee. You can share your photos with friends as puzzles. You can also tag puzzles, but first you have to pass a tagging test.
Bad tag! Bad tag! No no no!
I mean, come on. Isn’t that the point of tagging? That I can tag something as “Fred” if I want my friend Fred to view it? Or that I can create my own shorthand (TBR = to be read)? I do this with tagging, and I don’t consider myself misleading other people, because those tags are created for searching purposes, not browsing purposes.
I could see librarians leaping on this idea of creating tagging tests before users could contribute tags to a catalog. However, rather than improving the user experience, it’ll be one more hoop that we would be creating for users to jump through. Just say NO!
Posted by Cliff on January 29th, 2008
Read More
A nice email from Michael got me started into thinking about what advice I’d give the large library vendors when they start trying to “2.0″-ize their tools (websites, databases, etc.). Please feel free to add your own pointers.
- Find out what your users want. Before anything else, ask your users what they want. Will adding profiles/comments/customized lists help them, or just be an annoying distraction? Does it actually serve a pragmatic purpose, or is it just a neat, pretty toy dreamed up by coders for the coolness factor? Don’t get me wrong, I <3 neat, pretty tech toys as much as the next geeky librarian, but I don’t want to subject my users to them unless they ask for ‘em.
- Find out what your users need. Every reference librarian can tell you that just because a user can articulate what they want (“Where are your art books?”), that it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s what they need (A biography of Picasso that includes pictures, criticism, and an extensive bibliography of sources). Figure out the best resource for their needs, and then get them to it in the least number of clicks possible. This is why a Google search is awesome–it corrects my spelling, gives me scholarly and consumer information in one view, and provides additional information (addresses, phone numbers, news stories) on a contextual basis. Can your tool do that?
- Steal your users’ ideas. Just like every place of business, I find myself in ad-hoc brainstorming sessions all the time during regular meetings. A new technology or tool comes up, and we find ourselves asking if we want to do that or something similar. And yet, my gut reaction is, “Why don’t we have a student here to tell us if they’d actually use this?” Better than a bunch of librarians/vendors/coders coming up with ideas would be users coming up with them.
- Find out who your users are. Remember that no matter who the target audience is, you always have a diverse user population. Librarians are your users. Students are your users. Faculty & staff are your users. Members of the public are your users. People of many ages, skill levels, degree of ability and background are all your users. Each one searches differently. How does your tool cater to their needs?
- Let your users generate & change content. The larger your tool, the more you need this. Your organization’s workers won’t look at every remote record, but your users will. That’s the power of the long tail- -put your users to work, by having them correct and enhance records. A “report this page” link should be on every page of your site. Are you worried about vandalism and authority? Just make it a mediated process, and the technicians who normally would be tasked with fixing records will now approve user-changed/enhanced content. Unpaid volunteer workers–what administrator wouldn’t want that?
- Fix it yesterday. Have we become an impatient society? Yes. And yet, users are willing to wait for ILL and other in-person services, but they want web-based tools to work instantaneously. After all, they can get it instantaneously elsewhere. There are always ways to improve turnaround time, and your competitors are already using them. All it takes is one negative experience to lose a user forever (just ask Friendster).
- But you didn’t tell me to include profiles, wikis, or any other 2.0 tools?!? You’re right! Because the Web 2.0 and Library 2.0 concepts aren’t about tools–they’re about users, and making the user experience easier and richer. Just like the Internet Bust of the ’90s, many of the tools you see today will disappear or be merged with time. What you should be doing is asking your users what they want, because they will be be the ones to come up with the next “big idea” for your business, based around what they want and need. And it is in making those ideas a reality that will give your business the edge.
- Oh yeah, and ask your users. Yup, I’m saying it again. Are you redesigning your interface? Ask the users. Want to introduce a natural language search? Ask your users. Thinking of adding tags? Ask your users. Want to go out for Italian at lunch? Ask your users. The users are your audience–they are who you are writing/building/creating/coding/designing for. To create anything without their input is a waste of time and energy.
Posted by Cliff on January 7th, 2008
Read More
Yesterday the Pew Internet & American Life Project published Digital Footprints: Online identity management and search in the age of transparency. Although the initial numbers are fascinating (43% of online adults “neither worry about their personal information nor take steps to limit the amount of information that can be found out about them online), it is the narratives that pique my interest. Individual stories tell of how our activities online are recorded, aggregated, mined and used (and in many cases, with our consent and blessing). All of this transparency is adding more value to the information out there on the Web. As the report says, “People are not just findable, they are knowable.”
Those of us who are already active in Web 2.0 know about how changes to profiles, blogs & photostreams are recorded for all eternity (unless you take serious effort to remove it from the public record). The concept of privacy is giving way to the concept of online identity management; it’s not about whether there’s information about you online, it’s about who controls that information. Your address, phone number, and employer are all likely available on the open Web, but you have the ability to control whether your profile is visible to non-Friends.
So where does this lead libraries? Will we offer our users the ability to control their own information, or will we continue to destroy all records in the name of privacy? If users are willing to share what they read on other websites, should we allow them to do so via our catalogs?
Posted by Cliff on December 17th, 2007
Read More
