Subscribe to feed

Archive for the ‘teaching’ Category

Alas, I have yet again taken off my teacher’s rose-colored glasses.  When they’re on, I believe that all students have a thirst to learn (if you merely engage them), and that it’s not all about the grade.  That, of course, is not the case.

As I reported before, my students informed me about the pointlessness of the core curricula.  And yet, I thought that my class was different, because I was trying to engage them in the material, by reaching out to their experience.  I thought I was different.  I thought I was special.  I thought I was Katherine Watson.  (Ok, maybe that’s taking it a bit far…) But, the truth is I’m not different.  My class is just another requirement they must fulfill before they can start taking classes that they’re interested in.  I wonder how English 101 teachers do it year after year.

And when I look back, I was the same way in college.  I was only interested in Religious Studies classes.  I’ve never used those history or math courses beyond the rare reference question.  The required public speaking and computer courses felt redundant.  And to be honest, I really don’t remember the cross-disciplinary classes that I took (which is the same type of class that I’m teaching).

Have I given up hope?  Not completely.  I believe that some of my students are engaged with the material, even if only for a nanosecond.  A few of them will walk out of my course having learned something, even if it’s only that some insane librarian won’t stop yakking their ears off about this “2.0″ stuff that’s old hat to them.  And in the delusional-Katherine-Watson-wannabe part of my brain, I imagine one of these students perhaps becoming a librarian some day, and coming back to thank me.  Hey, a guy can have a dream, right?

But for now, I’ll scale back my in-class exercises to something a little more reasonable than trying to get students to engage in a full-scale fake search committee.  We’ll use the one example cover letter I got (thanks “Donald Duck”), and a couple of my own design to have them evaluate together as a class.  I still believe that making the connection between their online impression management and real-life job searches will help them in the future (even if they don’t know where they thought of it).

Having come to all these depressing conclusions, I will no doubt go through the same thing again the next time I teach this class.  For we, the hopeless optimist teachers of the world, have a tendancy to keep reaching for those rose-colored glasses again no matter how many times we promise ourselves we won’t.

What better way to teach information organization than to have students do it themselves? We started out with disorganization, which students had to find individual items from:

Organization & Access 004
Next, we put the items in alphabetical order by title. At this point I explained what articles are in the English language, and why including them can be a problem. Here we have the snail puppet filed under “S” for “snail puppet”, not “T” for “the snail puppet.”
Organization & Access 006
Then we tried to locate an item by editor, and found that it was difficult, since the items were arranged by title. An explanation of the purpose of the OPAC ensued. Then we discussed the nature of subject headings, as some items (such as Feminism and Addiction) had more than one subject. Then we started the fun of tagging the Holy Bible to create our own folksonomy:
Organization & Access 007
Each student created up to 10 tags, and placed identical tags near each other. By the end, we had a quite diverse tag cloud!
Organization & Access 011
Only three tags appeared more than once: God, Jesus and disciples. The rest were all original tags (some of them quite creative!).  Since the Holy Bible is both well known and widely interpreted, I was sure that we would get a diverse range of tags. If we had chosen a different item to tag, I’m sure we would have gotten a less diverse tag cloud.

I also asked students how they organized their own information (such as books and DVDs), explained the differences between taxonomy, ontology and folksonomy, and we discussed the benefits and drawbacks to each form of information organization.  Altogether the class took about 45 minutes, and the students were engaged right up to the end.

If you think this was a good (or bad) idea, let me know by leaving a comment.  Or better yet, write a half a page for my phoney job search before next Monday.  Please, do it for the children!