<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can you teach tagging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clifflandis.net/2008/01/29/can-you-teach-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clifflandis.net/2008/01/29/can-you-teach-tagging/</link>
	<description>Professional Creative Genius</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 07:39:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fudrow</title>
		<link>http://clifflandis.net/2008/01/29/can-you-teach-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-9314</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fudrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clifflandis.net/2008/01/29/can-you-teach-tagging/#comment-9314</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Making tagging a judgment call will only serve to alienate the casual tagger.  I had an idea a year or so ago, for creating a faceting tool that would allow librarians to organize and collect similar tags.  The facets would then be shared and would help to connect things that weren&#039;t necessarily originally linked.  The original model was meant to exist within a catalog, so that your items were limited to resources, but still pretty wide open content-wise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Making tagging a judgment call will only serve to alienate the casual tagger.  I had an idea a year or so ago, for creating a faceting tool that would allow librarians to organize and collect similar tags.  The facets would then be shared and would help to connect things that weren&#8217;t necessarily originally linked.  The original model was meant to exist within a catalog, so that your items were limited to resources, but still pretty wide open content-wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

